Pb Logo 25

HR horror stories from 2026: more terrifying tales from the workplace crypt

Hr Horror Stories Part 2

From workplace jokes that led to harassment claims to unfair dismissals and disciplinary disasters, these real-life UK employment tribunal cases reveal what can go wrong when HR issues are badly handled. In this Halloween special, we share five HR horror stories from 2026 and the practical lessons employers and HR managers can learn to avoid costly mistakes.

Last Halloween, we ventured into the workplace crypt to uncover some truly frightening HR horror stories. From age discrimination to dismissals by the bins, we discovered that real workplace dramas can be stranger than fiction.

Well, the crypt hasn’t stayed quiet. Another year has brought another collection of workplace nightmares, questionable decisions and expensive tribunal cases.

So, dust off your broomstick, grab a coffee and prepare for five more HR horror stories that might make you glad you’re not dealing with them.

The Michael Jackson impression that cost £10,000

A Co-op warehouse worker was dismissed after a colleague accused him of making high-pitched Michael Jackson-style noises and alleged racist behaviour.

Lucasz Zawadzki admitted making inappropriate, juvenile noises but denied they were racist.

In 2025, a tribunal found his dismissal unfair, awarding him £10,611 after reducing his compensation by 50% because of his conduct.

The lesson?  Even when behaviour is inappropriate, employers need evidence, a fair process and proportionate disciplinary action. Don’t let a poorly handled investigation become your next thriller.

Peter Rabbit and the £23,000 Easter egg nightmare

Who knew Easter eggs could cause so much trouble?

Care home team leader Alison Newey was suspended following concerns about donated Easter eggs, a printer and checks on an entertainer booked to appear as Peter Rabbit.

She subsequently resigned. The tribunal described the suspension as a knee-jerk reaction and found constructive unfair dismissal. She was awarded £23,409.

The lesson? Suspension shouldn’t be the automatic response to a concern. Investigate properly, assess the risks and consider alternatives before sending someone home. Otherwise, the Easter Bunny might leave you a rather expensive surprise.

The £17,000 ‘weirdo’ comment

An attempt to lighten the mood turned into an expensive mistake.

Nicholas James, an autistic employee at a children’s charity, had requested adjustments to background music and lighting. During discussions, his manager jokingly asked why he couldn’t be “ordinary and perfect like the rest of us”, before describing himself as a “weirdo” too.

The tribunal found the comments amounted to disability-related harassment. James was awarded over £17,000 following several successful claims.

The lesson? Good intentions don’t excuse inappropriate remarks. Managers need to take reasonable adjustments seriously, not turn them into a joke.

The expenses scandal served with a side of pizza

Here’s a frightening example of leaving evidence of your own misconduct.

Sales manager Susannah Bennison sent a colleague a voice note describing how she put family restaurant meals and takeaways through company expenses, encouraging her colleague to do likewise.

She was initially dismissed, reinstated on appeal and later resigned. In 2026, the tribunal rejected her constructive unfair dismissal claim, finding the voice note compelling evidence of serious misconduct.

The lesson? Clear expenses policies and proper checks are essential. And perhaps don’t record yourself encouraging colleagues to defraud your employer.

Keeping the HR nightmares at bay

These HR horror stories from 2026 might raise a smile, or maybe send a shiver down your spine, but there’s a serious message behind them. Poor judgement, inappropriate behaviour and badly handled HR decisions can have costly consequences.

This Halloween, it’s worth asking whether your managers understand their responsibilities, your policies are up to date, and your HR processes would stand up to scrutiny.

After all, the only skeletons you want in your workplace should be the Halloween decorations.

Are you worried your organisation might be heading for its own HR horror story? Whether it’s an awkward employee issue, an out-of-date policy or managers who need more confidence handling difficult situations, People Business can help. Get in touch with our friendly team before a small problem turns into a nightmare.

FAQs

Should an employee be suspended while a disciplinary investigation takes place?

Not automatically. Suspension should be considered carefully rather than used as a knee-jerk response to an allegation. Employers should assess whether it’s genuinely necessary and whether alternatives, such as temporary changes to duties, might work. An unnecessary or poorly handled suspension can seriously damage trust and create further problems.

Can a workplace joke or WhatsApp message count as harassment?

Yes. What one person considers harmless banter might be experienced very differently by someone else. Under the Equality Act 2010, unwanted behaviour related to a protected characteristic can amount to harassment, even if no offence was intended. This applies to work-related WhatsApp groups and online messages, as well as face-to-face conversations.

How can employers reduce the risk of employment tribunal claims?

Start with clear, up-to-date HR policies and make sure managers understand how to apply them. Regular management training, fair disciplinary procedures, good record-keeping and dealing with concerns promptly can all make a difference. For smaller businesses without dedicated HR expertise, getting advice early can prevent a manageable issue from becoming an expensive legal dispute.

Can you dismiss an employee for inappropriate behaviour at work?

Yes, depending on the seriousness of the behaviour and the circumstances. But even when misconduct seems obvious, employers still need to follow a fair disciplinary process. This usually means investigating properly, giving the employee an opportunity to respond and considering whether dismissal is proportionate. Getting the process wrong can lead to an unfair dismissal claim.

Go to Top